Answers on the comments of Reviewer 2 of the paper

نویسندگان

  • Anatoly Abrashkin
  • Efim Pelinovsky
چکیده

Reviewer 2: First, it suffers a lack of illustration. Indeed, a single figure appears, and intends to show the full geometry of the problem. For instance, from the figure, I cannot understand what is this “average current” (average in time, in ‘a’ coordinate? In ‘b’ coordinate?) Neither can I see a weak vorticity. Thus, the definition of vorticity is confusing. Another way to say the same thing is that the Euler to Lagrange coordinate transform is not clear. Is a background vertical flow included? Or do we only consider the vertical flow induced by the waves?

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

ارزیابی میزان دقت داوران یکی از مجلات علمی پژوهشی فارسی زبان در تشخیص اصلاحات مورد نیاز یک مقاله علمی ارسالی؛ سال 1389

  Background and Objectives: Final corrections on a manuscript sent for publication in a scientific journal are suggested by reviewers. So this qualifies the paper with the least errors for publication. The present study aimed to assess the Persian language peer reviewers' comments on a manuscript sent to an Iranian Scientific Journal (journal of Rafsanjan university of medical sciences), 2010....

متن کامل

Interactive comment on “ Temporal evolution of main ambient PM 2 . 5 sources in Santiago , Chile , from 1998 to 2012 ” by Francisco Barraza

The authors give thanks to the reviewer for all the comments and questions that made it possible to vastly improve the manuscripts and the robustness of the results. The main changes to the new manuscript are focused in three areas: i) an appropriate description of the sampling and the quality assurance/quality control of the chemical data, ii) new comparative discussion of our results with oth...

متن کامل

Answers to the Comments of Reviewer #1 and Related Actions on the Paper

FOREWORD The authors are obliged to the reviewers for the time spent in revising the paper. In the following pages, we describe in detail how their concerns have been addressed. Some of the requests of the reviewers imply adding a lot of material in the paper. For space limitations we added this material to the extended version of our paper, which is available on line [17] and we referenced suc...

متن کامل

Antithetical Gendered Stances in Readers’ Comments on Domestic Violence against Men

Domestic violence against women (DVAW) has received much attention from scholars across disciplines, leading to a circumvention of studies on domestic violence against men (DVAM). This paper, therefore, engages in a qualitative dialogic analysis of readers’ comments on cases of DVAM reported in select blogs in order to elicit opposing gendered stances on DVAM in the selected readers’ comments; ...

متن کامل

Review History of 2009ja015069

Below and/or attached are two reviews of the above manuscript. I am pleased to report that Reviewer #1 finds the manuscript acceptable for publication but Reviewer #2 still has some strong concerns. I have some sympathy with the view expressed in your covering letter, that Reviewer #2 may have a biased attitude. However, it would be inappropriate for me to entirely ignore their comments, so I p...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017